Methodology Note

Platform Risk Benchmark — What We Can and Can't Say

A short note on what is publicly reported about platform enforcement and account recovery times — and why credible benchmarks for creator downtime do not yet exist.

4 min read · Published 2 April 2026

What is publicly known

YouTube, Meta and TikTok each publish transparency reports covering removed content and accounts, but none publish median recovery time for hijacked or wrongly-actioned creator accounts in a way that can be benchmarked across platforms.

Instagram's own Help Centre states that account review and recovery can take time, and independent reporting (e.g. The Telegraph, BBC) has documented cases running several weeks to months — consistent with the 1–4 week range we cite elsewhere on this site.

Why we are not publishing a single 'average lockout' figure

There is no publicly auditable dataset that supports a single industry-wide average. Any number that claims to be one is either drawn from a self-selected survey, a single broker's book, or modelled assumptions — and should be read as such.

GMG will publish a benchmark when our own claims data is statistically meaningful and can be reported anonymously. Until then we point readers to platform transparency reports and named press coverage.

✓ Verified sources

4 sources · 3 claims

Every third-party claim used in this briefing

Source list

  1. [1]
    Hacked accounts — Help Centre
    Instagram (Meta) · Published Ongoing · Verified 1 Jun 2026
  2. [2]
    YouTube Community Guidelines enforcement
    Google / YouTube Transparency Report · Published Quarterly · Verified 1 Jun 2026
  3. [3]
    Transparency Center
    Meta · Published Quarterly · Verified 1 Jun 2026
  4. [4]
    Community Guidelines Enforcement Report
    TikTok · Published Quarterly · Verified 1 Jun 2026

Every figure in this briefing is attributable to a named third-party publication above. GMG will publish its own anonymised, aggregated claims data once it is statistically meaningful.